The Margins Review · Culture-Centered Approach

  My statement delivered in ICA 2026 Oceania Hub. Aotearoa New Zealand.  For two days in Palmerston North, on land that tangata whenua never ceded, scholars and movement workers from Palestine and across the colonised world gathered under one banner: communicative equality against empire. We studied how voice is organised, who is made audible and who is made to disappear, how the infrastructures of speech are built to serve power. Then we turned to our own house. Silence in the face of empire is complicity. The Oceania Hub of the International Communication Association condemns the Executive Committee's prolonged institutional silence on the catastrophe in Palestine. For nearly two years after October 2023, as Gaza endured mass killing, forced displacement, the deliberate destruction of universities, hospitals, and entire knowledge ecosystems, and what numerous international legal authorities have named as genocide, the ICA's leadership chose strategic muteness. When a state...

  The metrology of consent: the Edelman Trust Barometer and the manufacture of crisis Each January, timed to the gathering of corporate and political elites at the World Economic Forum, the public relations conglomerate Edelman releases a global index it calls the Trust Barometer. The business press reports its findings as readings drawn from a sealed and disinterested instrument. Surveying tens of thousands of respondents across more than two dozen countries, the barometer issues an annual verdict on the degree to which populations trust four institutions, government, business, media and the non-governmental sector, and that verdict then circulates through editorials, keynote decks and policy briefings as the empirical baseline for elite deliberation on the legitimacy of democratic life. The presentation is metrological. The operation is governmental. The barometer does not record a pre-existing distribution of public trust. It manufactures trust as a calculable object, installs...

  The Threat in the Mirror How Empire Manufactures China — and What an Indigenous Diplomacy Offers Aotearoa Mohan J. Dutta — The Margins Review Every year, on schedule, New Zealand is instructed to be afraid. In its 2025 threat assessment the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service named China "the most active" agent of foreign interference in the country — an escalation from the "complex intelligence concern" of the year before — and in June 2026 it warned that Chinese operatives were recruiting New Zealanders through job sites and professional networks. The reports arrive pre-headlined. Our newsrooms recite them in the grammar of inevitability. The threat is not demonstrated; it is declared. And in the declaring, it becomes the weather: ambient, unarguable, simply the condition under which a small Pacific nation is now told it must live. This essay examines that machinery. I want to read the media construction of China, and of the Chinese threat, through a ...

  Grant Robertson, Vice Chancellor, University of Otago Manufacturing Neutrality How the radical right turned a civic ideal into an instrument for capturing the university In late May 2026, Grant Robertson, vice-chancellor of the University of Otago and the country's former finance minister, wrote to his university community about a piece of legislation moving through the New Zealand Parliament. The Legislation (Definitions of Woman and Man) Amendment Bill, a member's bill carried by New Zealand First, would fix in statute that a woman is an adult human biological female and a man an adult human biological male, language that quietly withdraws legal recognition from trans, intersex, and non-binary people. Robertson told staff and students that he found the bill unnecessary and disturbing, and he acknowledged those who had gathered to protest it. For the students whose existence the bill proposed to legislate away, the email carried a plain reassurance, that the institution co...

  Neutrality Has Become the Far Right's Weapon Against the University T he Free Speech Union's pursuit of Grant Robertson shows how a doctrine sold as protection is used to punish a university for caring for its most vulnerable students. By Mohan J. Dutta In late May, the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Otago wrote to his community. New Zealand First's Legislation (Definitions of Woman and Man) Amendment Bill , which would write into law that a woman is "an adult human biological female" and a man "an adult human biological male," had just passed its first reading. Grant Robertson told students and staff that he found the bill "unnecessary and disturbing" at a personal level. He acknowledged those who had protested the cuts in this year's Budget. For a trans student at Otago reading those words on a screen, the message was plain. The person at the top of my university sees me. I am not on the wrong side of anything here. Within days...

  Desi Alert At the end of all her travelling, Shobhaa De comes home to Mumbai and writes the most revealing lines in either of her columns, and she has no idea she has done it. She is relieved. The airport is gorgeous, the immigration officers are polite and efficient, and best of all there are porters and loaders to carry bags that somehow weigh a ton. She has missed this abroad. She calls it a basic requirement rather than an indulgence, and says the absence of such service might make her rethink certain destinations. She means it as the tender gratitude of a tired senior citizen who has earned her comforts. It is the most honest sentence she writes in two columns of scolding. And the man who makes it true, the porter bent under her ton of luggage, is the one person she never once thinks to see. That is the whole problem, standing right next to her in a uniform. De has spent two columns cataloguing the sins of the loud desi. The pushing past the queue. The pack travelling tog...

  The Freeloader's Frame A small nation built its standing in the world on the things it refused to do. Washington came to Singapore to make it forget. There is a tell in the title Pete Hegseth now carries. He walked onto the stage at Singapore's Shangri-La Dialogue at the end of May not as Secretary of Defense but as Secretary of War, a cabinet name the Trump administration dug out of the era before the United States learned to disguise its intentions in softer language. People treat the change as theater. It is grammar. A government chooses its nouns the way an army chooses ground. Defense describes a crouch. War describes an appetite. The word announces, before any policy does, how the men running American power would like the century to be read: as a field of contest in which strength is the only language anyone is permitted to speak, and peace is merely the name we give to a balance held at gunpoint. What Hegseth delivered from that stage was less a speech than a litu...