Skip to main content

The whiteness of capitalist publishing models: Decolonizing conversations must interrogate the economics of publishing


 

As an editor of a major communication journal that is committed to praxis, I have been reflecting on what the practical politics of publishing looks like even as our disciplinary associations pronounce our commitments to diversity, inclusion, and decolonization.

How far can we decolonize when our publishing models are based on, held up by, and dependent on the publishing infrastructure of large publishing transnational corporations? 

Almost all of these large publishing transnational corporations are based in Europe/America, rooted in colonial logics of extraction.

The colonial logic underpinning these publishing corporations is evident in the fundamental logic of profiteering that shapes academic publishing. 

Journals are set up as platforms to publish scholarship, built as infrastructures to generate revenues for transnational publishing corporations.

From editors to editorial review board members to reviewers, an entire chain of unpaid or poorly paid academic labour holds up the journal infrastructure. 

As academics, we are trained into counting this work of peer reviewing as integral to our academic identities. We must perform this unpaid labour as a service to the profession. 

The countless hours of work reviewing manuscripts, editing them, and dialoguing with authors through the peer review process are unpaid, based on the expectation that this is part of the academic job.

Yet, the mechanics of the publishing process and the economic logic of the publishing platforms are entirely opaque to us. 

I am struck by how often colleagues have no idea about the revenue streams and revenues generated from journals. 

For instance, what is the actual revenue generated by a journal? What percentage of this is profit? How much of the profit is retained by the publisher? How much of the profit is distributed to the association? How is the revenue, if any, distributed to the association, put to use?

These questions largely remain unanswered, with a publishing framework that is largely opaque to academics.

With the increasing and rapid globalization of publishing, much of the actual labour in the publishing process is shipped out to knowledge process outsourcing centres in the Global South. 

Knowledge labourers in the Global South perform the various tasks of managing the platform, from coordinating the flow of manuscripts to copy-editing the manuscripts, often at poorly paid wages. 

This process of academic production then reproduces an extractive colonial economy where the Global South is exploited for cheap labour. 

The irony then is striking that even as we publish articles on decolonizing our journals, we do so to reproduce a predatory model that exploits cheap labour from the Global South. 

The irony of the whiteness of diversity and inclusion in journal publishing lies in its incorporation of decolonization talk to create and reproduce the whiteness of the capitalist publishing model that largely profits white, western capital.

Serious decolonization work therefore must agitate to undo this predatory model of journal publishing.


Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...
Read more