Skip to main content

American hegemony in Communication: Neo-imperialism and market-logics

So much of the discipline of Communication research and the pedagogy of Communication is founded on the principles of developing communication skillsets for effectiveness. As global markets have opened up to the export/import of education, Communication skills training has sought to find robust markets abroad.

The assumption behind this marketing enterprise is that Americans have something to offer (in this case, a US-branded knowledge base about what makes up good and effective communication) to the rest of the world. The competitive advantage of the American brand of communication education therefore ties to this ability of the brand to develop a unique selling proposition and to sell it well to its target audiences abroad. So we have wholesale programs ranging from public speaking to writing that are attempting to make entries into Asian markets.

What I find completely misguided about this picture though is that it continues to reek of US-style imperialism and arrogance (based on the belief that the Americans can export their democracy, civil society, capitalism, nation building, communication skillsets to the rest of the world). It continues to carry on the basic assumption that Americans can teach others across the globe how to become better communicators (of course based on an assumption of effectiveness and superiority).

In addition to the basic problem of arrogance and American exceptionalism that is built into this logic, I also find the logic to be counterintuitive to the narrative of the market and market research. Market research begins with the basic premise that you first conduct formative secondary and primary data gathering to figure out who your audience is even before you start developing and designing your product. If US academics of Communication who so desire to market their communication skillsets to Asia want to be effective, my suggestion to them would be that they begin with first understanding their markets in Asia, the cultures that they are marketing to, and the needs that originate from within these market. However, I am not so sure that the US-style academic system is capable of doing this because of the fundamental problem of US exceptionalism that makes Americans arrogant and poor listeners in global arenas (you have to look at the history of recent decades of US diplomacy globally to get a sense of this).

To really be effective, US communicators who want to export US-style knowledge of effective communication skills perhaps need to begin by being humble and by unlearning the basic premises of communication that make them arrogant. The starting point is perhaps the recognition that US-style research and teaching of communication is just that, a cultural artifact that is deeply rooted in American assumptions about what communication is and what makes it effective.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...