Skip to main content

Posts

neoliberal frames in HIV/AIDS Communication

Tomorrow, I present my concept paper " Interrogating neoliberal ideologies of HIV/AIDS Communication: Power, Control, and Agency " at the IAMCR conference in Dublin. The paper is a key component of my upcoming book on "Neoliberalism and Health Communication" to be published by Left Coast Press. Here is the summary of the key arguments in the piece: HIV/AIDS has witnessed a global response over the last decade. Global NGOs, Foundations, private corporations, and state governments have joined hands in tackling HIV/AIDS. Prevention services and health care services in the domain of HIV/AIDS are framed within the interconnected linkages of Foundations, private corporations and nation states. The ideology guiding the global work on HIV/AIDS is shaped within the organizing framework of neoliberalism, privileging market rationality in addressing HIV/AIDS. (a) the response to HIV/AIDS has been taken over by large Foundations such as the Gates Foundation, UNAIDS

Communication and the politics of inequality: Notes from Jangalmahal

The fieldwork in May 2013 focused on developing frameworks around the key problems faced by community members in the villages and the corresponding solutions the community members envisioned. This round of culture-centered fieldwork worked on the scope of the problems that the community would begin its work on. The community had already decided the broad scope of problems. Our role, my role, as a researcher and the role of the community organizer, are tied to developing the scope of solutions to be implemented in the community as identified by community members. In this round of conversations, the community members identified the problem of water for irrigation as the key problem facing the community. This was also identified through the in-depth interviews and earlier ethnographic work as the primary problem in the community, connected to the experiences of food insecurity and the struggles with poverty. Community members identified the need to build (a) deep tube well, and

"How is your research relevant to the US?" The taken-for-granted assumptions of Whiteness

Rotin , a student from a moffusil town of Bengal, once came to work with me as a student. He wanted to make change in the world, make a real difference in the rural Bengal that he had seen around him growing up. Growing up in moffusil Bengal, he had seen a lot of poverty all around him. He had grown up amidst the poverty. He wanted to earn a PhD because he wanted to make a difference in the world. He felt that learning the tools of communication would equip him with the tools that he needed to work on grassroots change. He didn't talk much, usually just smiled at me when I pushed him to work harder or become more confident in his ways. When I shared with him my journeys of fighting back and shared why I felt he needed to express his convictions boldly, he just smiled back at me. I wanted him to share the anger that we experienced as academics of color in an academe so ensconced in its expectations of Whiteness. And Rotin just smiled in silence. In his silence, I s

With due apologies if I have interrupted your grief!

I cry in our sadness In the loss of a little child in the hills and plains of Pakistan, US, Somalia, Afghanistan. I weep in pain in the suffering in our suffering. My grief like yours hurts. My loss like yours is loss. Our grief, here and there is grief. My body like yours hurts. But it is I who has to do the explaining It is I who has to be interrogated It is I whose motives have to be questioned It is I who will be accused of interrupting your grief It is I who will be lectured on civility the appropriateness of time, place, context. And I must go on Because grief must be interrupted. Lest it be used for more violence. I must go on Because Grief must be interrupted. Mine, yours, ours. Stories must be told, Imaginations must be engaged, questions must be raised, here, now, there Everywhere.  

Violence, death and the racist tropes of discourse

Facebook today is inundated with accounts of pain, empathy, and outpouring of support for Boston. Headlines and posts such as "terror strikes again" have caught our attention once again. The show of emotion expresses itself in the act of reaching out, in finding a common point of emotional sharing with the people in Boston. Stories emerge that seek to respect the dignity of the lives lived. Our attention is drawn to the observations that this is one of the oldest marathons and that the race was taking place on a special day, symbolizing all the good things about freedom, liberty, and independence. The stories of heroism emerge on this backdrop to narrate the courage of the American people. The expressed emotions on social media ranging from pain to anger remind me of the range of emotions I was immersed in after the 9/11 attacks. The inherent goodness and strength of Boston residents is juxtaposed in the backdrop of the imagined perpetrator of terror. Along the lin

Let's talk about data!

A Planned Parenthood activist who labels herself as feminist surprisingly uses the argument that "family planning interventions work and have effectively empowered women in the global South." She apparently draws on the rhetoric of gender empowerment to advocate for Planned Parenthood. What surprises me about the position articulated in the advocacy statement above is its uncritical celebration of the language of empowerment without interrogating the questions of power that are tied to the interpretive frames circulated in family planning interventions. I am also surprised by the erasure of the historic complicity of Planned Parenthood in racist population control programs in the early years, working closely with eugenicists to shape population control programs directed at poor, black and colored recipients of the Third World. The lack of historical familiarity with the context within which family planning interventions developed demonstrates the fluidity of human righ

Voices of hunger: Interrogating inequality

The "Voices of Hunger" project, a narrative co-construction grounded in the CCA with the food insecure in Indiana, depicts the everyday struggles with the absence of food among the food insecure. At the time that the project was taking its roots, inequality in the US was on the rise, and there were a growing section of the middle class who had been "thrown to the streets." http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcom.12009/abstract A theme that continued to reiterate through the stories of hunger was the uncertainty around it and the suddenness with which community members experienced it. http://www.care-cca.com/about/cca-video-series/voices-of-hunger/ The transition from a life of plenty to a life of hunger was often unexpected and sudden. It all happened overnight. The two storey home; the car; the fenced back yard. The signs of middle class comfort that depicted the life a large majority of Americans were soon disappearing, and for most of the com

The question of entitlement!

Mediocrity is often built into the everyday practices of academe under the guise of civility. Civility becomes the trope that manages our academic relationships. I see this for example in how teacher student relationships are constructed. The value of such relationships measured in the form of student evaluations works well to reify the status quo. Teachers are prompted by the lowest common denominator under such systems of measurement. Learning takes the backseat as teachers work on minimizing assignments, making lectures entertaining etc. so that teaching evaluations can be higher. Minimizing expectations then works to reify the mediocrity of the status quo. As teachers, we pay more attention to making nice than to caring about our students learning. We are also trained to be inauthentic, managing our teaching by norms of civility in the mainstream, learning to stage a face. The neoliberal organizing of knowledge works precisely through the organizing of teaching under a

Individualism versus collectivism in culture-centering processes

Over the past couple of months, I have been engaging adolescents in Marion County in centering their voices to identify heart health needs and propose solutions that are meaningful to them. The adolescent heart project emerged from the suggestions of the adults in the CUAHD project. Thus far, the experience of working with teenagers to design and implement a health campaign targeting heart disease has been interesting, and speaks to the uniqueness of our broad theoretical framework, the culture-centered approach that seeks to locate decision making power into the hands of the community. An example of the interesting dynamic that is playing out in the project is the concept of individualism versus collectivism in decision making and in driving the project forward. On March 6, I emailed the group about my inability to attend the planned strategy development workshop due to bad weather .Interestingly, the group proceeded with organizing the workshop as originally scheduled, and also set

Negotiations of objectivity in the social sciences

In our ""CCA" module, we discussed the nuances in our understandings of objectivity in the social sciences. Delineating the break from the natural sciences, understandings of objectivity in the social sciences are constituted in the values of the researcher, her/his constructions of the self, her/his relationship with the subjectivity of the research participants, and her/his negotiations with materiality. That there are material contexts of symbolic behavior is a key point in culturally-centered work, and yet this material context is negotiated symbolically, through language and through acts of representation. In this sense, communication lies at the heart of the social sciences, the world of the material being negotiated through meaning making. We come to understand materiality through the symbolically mediatized narrativization of the material world. For example, the everyday lived experience of struggling with hunger is a material reality that is felt in the

Tenure in Singapore and West-centric discourse

The hegemony of West-centrism and the question of academic freedom: From a half-baked lens in my short time in Singapore Recently, a colleague at Nanyang Technological University, an associate professor of communication Dr. Cherian George was denied tenure (http://storify.com/kuekj/denial-of-tenure-sparks-furore).   Dr. Cherian is considered a leading public intellectual in Singapore, one who has opened up the discursive space to conversations about Singapore and its politics (http://www.cheriangeorge.net/).   This instance of Dr. Cherian’s denial of tenure has become the subject of widespread political participation, letter writing, and conversations across Singapore. The social media is rife with multiple conversation threads that have questioned the tenure and promotion process at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) as well as the fairness of the outcome (http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/niftyc/archives/790).   Outpouring support from students and colleagues hav