Skip to main content

The Interview: Campusing and the culture of greed

This post was prompted by a Facebook post made by one of my doctoral advisees Rahul Rastogi. The post depicted the ways in which a group of students occupied a Recruitment session held by Goldman Sachs at Princeton University.

The occupation of the Goldman Sachs recruitment session, similar to many such occupations happening across the US, was innovative in its ability to draw our attention to the interplays of corruption and greed on college campuses, and in raising some fundamental questions about practices such as corporate recruitment on our college and university campuses.

Universities and colleges are often the breeding grounds for the unethical practices that are embodied in the corporate cultures of organizations like Goldman Sachs, J P Morgan Chase, and Lehman Brothers. However, on many college and university campuses, and particularly among the elite students of elite MBA programs of these universities and colleges, for the longest time, these were the most coveted jobs. So what breeds in students the desire for fundamentally unethical organizations such as Goldman Sachs, J P Morgan Chase, and Lehman Brothers. Is it the lack of knowledge? Is it the basic absence of a moral/ethical compass among these students? Or is it some combination of both?

I believe the ignorance that is typically evident among the MBA types who typically have not for instance read up on the (unethical aspects of) corporate practices of Goldman Sachs is also connected to the basic absence of a moral/ethical compass among these students. Many of these students grow up on the myth that everyone has access to basic resources, and one's ability to do well in life is tied to how much God-gifted talent they have (you can see Ayn Rand at work early on). Their parents feed them the notion from early on that as long as they take care of themselves, the world will operate just fine. I have heard articulations such as "The poor are poor because they are lazy," or "There are thousands of beggars that you come across everyday in India. You can't possibly ask me to feel compassion for each one of them" among this prototype.

So these students, finding their way into elite MBA programs, think of themselves as the children of God. They are the chosen few; the ones that have the brains and the ability to make it big. Their king-size egos are further fed by the variety of business school tools such as case studies, mock interviews, group discussions etc., where the more arrogant and pompous you are, the greater your reward and likelihood of getting ahead.The entitlement then works powerfully in subverting the capacity to ask critical questions or to interrogate the logic through which campus interviews, job talks, recruitment efforts are organized. Being critical would also mean that the MBA types would also need to interrogate the fundamental tenets of entitlement upon which their entire education has been constituted. Being critical would mean that we ask these students to start questioning the very articulations of greed that have constituted their life goals.

For college and university campuses to start engaging in questions about the values embodied in the organizations they desire to work for, courses on critical empowerment need to be offered not simply in the Liberal Arts but in the sciences, engineering, and management programs. Concepts such as transparency, accountability, and reflexivity need to be turned into everyday concepts that can be engaged in the everyday practices of living among our students. And most importantly, rather than turning our students into privileged minions of corporations without backbones, we need to emphasize the ways in which we can teach them to interrogate their privilege and put this privilege to use in actively imagining and creating a just world.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Tova O’Brien and pedagogy of whiteness

So Tova O’Brien was looking for a click-bait opportunity to draw in listeners to her podcast and she found the migrant activist and Green Party politician Dr. Sapna Samant to pick on. In a gotcha moment, Tova shared with the Green Party co-leader James Shaw a series of posts made by Dr. Samant on whiteness, Hindutva, and multiculturalism, asking him if the tweets were OK. We don’t understand from listening to O’Brien’s podcast if her research team actively researched Dr. Sapna Samant’s social media posts, or whether these selective screen captures of Dr. Samant’s tweets were sent to her by someone wanting to target Samant. The thoroughly unresearched piece is poor journalism, reflective of the mediocrity that is perpetuated by whiteness , the hegemonic values of the dominant white culture in settler colonies. If indeed her research team had discovered the tweets, it’s worth interrogating why the social media posts of a migrant woman activist on whiteness are of interest to O’Brien’s po