Skip to main content

Traditional Medicine. Biomedicine. New Debates. Old War.

This week's reading discussed the possibilities of alternative ways of healing and health. The debate between traditional methods of cure/ preventing illnesses and the dominant biomedicine was the center of the discussions. With examples from different parts of the world, the authors promoted their viewpoints.

Mansfield et. al (2002) focused their research on the religious practices and spiritual beliefs of people regarding health care in people from rural eastern North Carolina, USA. Their research says that "health professionals should consider the faith of patients, not only in God per se, but also in how patients believe that God may act through a health professional in the healing process" (p. 407). Without getting into any criticisms of the study, I would like to share something from this research that reminded me of a personal story about how during critical times of illness people may lean more towards the unexplained and spiritual that what is explicitly available (such as in biomedicine).

During my middle and high school years, my classmates and I had this teacher who taught us Bangla. During our 9th grade, all of a sudden we heard that she has passed away! We could not believe what we were hearing. Was it an accident? Did she get into a road accident? No. She died of cancer. We never had any idea she was even sick. Then gradually we found out that she had breast cancer and she had gotten very scared and decided to go with spiritual healing.

She had gone to a religious man in a remote part of Dhaka city (the capital city of Bangladesh) who had given her pora pani - regular water treated with blessings from that religious person, most likely using verses from the Qur'aan. So our favorite "Bangla Miss" died from cancer because the pora pani did not work. At that age we did not realize (or even know to appreciate) that perhaps we should have respected her choice about seeking alternative health care, or that who are we to even judge what is better. I remember all we thought about was he absurdity of trying to cure cancer with pora pani. Perhaps she felt that God may work through that healer and who can question His willingness?

This example, in my opinion, reflects pretty much what Mansield et al's findings from the research. Perhaps it would be interesting to look at the genesis of local and traditional modes of healing in Bangladesh as Cho (2000) writes about. It would be also interesting to see how the politics of the region affects the decision making process of everyday Bangladeshis, especially the rural people. It has become almost a fashion in Bangladesh to discount traditional medicine, but what if evidence comes out that the roots of current biomedicine actually lie in traditional medicine as Tortter (2000) suggested.

So much to explore . . .

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Tova O’Brien and pedagogy of whiteness

So Tova O’Brien was looking for a click-bait opportunity to draw in listeners to her podcast and she found the migrant activist and Green Party politician Dr. Sapna Samant to pick on. In a gotcha moment, Tova shared with the Green Party co-leader James Shaw a series of posts made by Dr. Samant on whiteness, Hindutva, and multiculturalism, asking him if the tweets were OK. We don’t understand from listening to O’Brien’s podcast if her research team actively researched Dr. Sapna Samant’s social media posts, or whether these selective screen captures of Dr. Samant’s tweets were sent to her by someone wanting to target Samant. The thoroughly unresearched piece is poor journalism, reflective of the mediocrity that is perpetuated by whiteness , the hegemonic values of the dominant white culture in settler colonies. If indeed her research team had discovered the tweets, it’s worth interrogating why the social media posts of a migrant woman activist on whiteness are of interest to O’Brien’s po