Skip to main content

Narratives and visualizations of health, healing, and rebirth

Narratives are the stories that we create to construct our identities...who we are...and sometimes who we would like to be. Narratives played an important role in my thesis research as it was the stimulus material used to assess people's willingness to become an organ donor. These narratives ranged from short to long, stories of death and dying, to stories of rebirth. Never had I really thought about the complexity through which such stories were developed nor the significance that such retelling of one's story might have. These narratives we re collected from people who had had experiences with organ donation either from the donating side wherein a family member had to make the tough decision to donate a loved one's organs or from the recipient side wherein the individual received another's organs or lastly from the perspective of an individual that is still waiting for a life-saving transplant. All narratives were compelling but some narratives in particular stuck out given our recent readings for Culture and Health.

In looking back on the narratives that were collected I saw much variation in the stories of recipients. One might think that recipients might have a similar story to tell; they waited for a transplant and one faithful day they got a phone call that a match had been found, but the story is not that simple. If our narratives that we create help us to create our identity and define ourselves, it is quite interesting to look at what aspects of the transplantation experience gets incorporated and left out of the overall narrative. Stories ranged from completely and utterly gruesome to very clean and politically correct. One of the things that I found quite interesting was the choice of whether or not an individual included the story of their donor in their narrative. For obvious reasons, some people may know more about their donor than others but on the whole I found it interesting that some people elaborated on the lives of and gratitude they had for their recipients. A question came to mind. What makes one adopt or not adopt another's story into their own narrative of health and healing? I am very interested in the language used to discuss the joining of lives through the narrative and what that means for the recipient and the donor family. This language seems to take on the qualities of rebirth and the afterlife for some as donor families talk about their loved ones living on through the act of donation. For those who do not express this same amount of gratitude, how much different do they see their personal narrative before and after transplantation? How does one's identity change through transplantation and how is that manifested in the narratives we tell?

In thinking about the chapter in our Postcolonial Disorders text at first I was a bit confused as to why this chapter was included in the mix given the four previous readings I'd done for the class. Initially I thought that this artistic display had little to do with narratives in the context which they were previously being discussed. However, after examining the graphics and reading the descriptions and explanations the artists gave about there work it all made sense to me. These artists were using visual narratives to express their frustration and concern with the political unrest of their region. Without words we could see the pain and heartache, the anger and frustration, yet at the same time the hope for a new day and change to come under a new democratic rule. In a sense these works of art could be seen as narratives about the health of Indonesia. These visual narratives spoke perhaps with even more strength than do many of the narratives that we recount verbally. Which is the more powerful narrative, the visual or written narrative? What can we learn from these different narratives about the identities that people construct or fight from constructing in times of turmoil? These are a few things that I was left pondering.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Tova O’Brien and pedagogy of whiteness

So Tova O’Brien was looking for a click-bait opportunity to draw in listeners to her podcast and she found the migrant activist and Green Party politician Dr. Sapna Samant to pick on. In a gotcha moment, Tova shared with the Green Party co-leader James Shaw a series of posts made by Dr. Samant on whiteness, Hindutva, and multiculturalism, asking him if the tweets were OK. We don’t understand from listening to O’Brien’s podcast if her research team actively researched Dr. Sapna Samant’s social media posts, or whether these selective screen captures of Dr. Samant’s tweets were sent to her by someone wanting to target Samant. The thoroughly unresearched piece is poor journalism, reflective of the mediocrity that is perpetuated by whiteness , the hegemonic values of the dominant white culture in settler colonies. If indeed her research team had discovered the tweets, it’s worth interrogating why the social media posts of a migrant woman activist on whiteness are of interest to O’Brien’s po